Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Integrated weed management in both crops (IWM-IWM) increased system yield by 31.78% over the weedy check.

A claim from Effect of Tillage and Weed Control Methods in Maize (Zea mays) -Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Cropping System · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated weed management in both crops (IWM-IWM) increased system yield by 31.78% over the weedy check.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Integrated weed management performed in maize and wheat (IWM-IWM) sequencee3
Outcome
system yielde6
Direction
highere6
Value
31.78%e6
Comparator
weedy checke5

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–62
e3

“Integrated weed management performed in maize and wheat (IWM-IWM) sequence recorded 51.78% and 61.96% higher maize grain yield and net return of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–920
e6

“31.78% and 34.96% higher system yield and net return respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1055
e5

“compared to weedy check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1080

Title

Effect of Tillage and Weed Control Methods in Maize (Zea mays) -Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Cropping System

Dept. of Agronomy, BAU, Ranchi, Jharkhand (834 006), India; R. R. Upasani; Sheela Barla; et al. International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management 2017. doi:10.23910/ijbsm/2017.8.6.3c0156

Other claims from this paper (16)

Record rev-a45c0b60c7ce146001aa9cd6592b74d1ccddf9257958420ca4b957edb127f86b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

Triticum aestivum · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

102 papers: 83 positive, 19 negative or no effect

82 papers in the same direction as this claim · 18 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
    Winter annual forage reduced subsequent corn yield.

    Integrating a Double‐Cropped Winter Annual Forage into a Corn‐Soybean Rotation · 2002 · compared with treatments thatdid not have a double‐crop winter annual forage

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

93 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

herbicide · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

651 papers: 500 positive, 151 negative or no effect

499 papers in the same direction as this claim · 127 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

642 papers more in this group

See all 651 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.