Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Zero tillage with or without residue improved soil pH, organic carbon and CO 2.

A claim from Effect of Tillage and Weed Control Methods in Maize (Zea mays) -Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Cropping System · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage with or without residue improved soil pH, organic carbon and CO 2.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Zero tillage with or without residuee7
Outcome
soil pH, organic carbon, CO 2e7
Direction
improvede7

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–62
e7

“Zero tillage with or without residue recorded improved soil pH, organic carbon, CO 2 and dehydrogenase activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1193

Title

Effect of Tillage and Weed Control Methods in Maize (Zea mays) -Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Cropping System

Dept. of Agronomy, BAU, Ranchi, Jharkhand (834 006), India; R. R. Upasani; Sheela Barla; et al. International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management 2017. doi:10.23910/ijbsm/2017.8.6.3c0156

Other claims from this paper (16)

Record rev-eb634b5914fddde931beb4565f354a0f0ed8cc931cb354a6c870e8ed7ec7f8b0 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

tillage · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

82 papers: 68 positive, 14 negative or no effect

67 papers in the same direction as this claim · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

73 papers more in this group

See all 82 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.