Intervention effectmodel-written summary

No till raised chickpea yield by 3.8% in the first cycle.

A claim from Short Crop Rotation under No-Till Improves Crop Productivity and Soil Quality in Salt Affected Areas · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No till raised chickpea yield by 3.8% in the first cycle.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
NTe1
Outcome
crop yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
3.8%e0
Comparator
CTe1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chickpea 3.8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 345–358
e1

“Compared with the CT treatment, crop yield was consistently higher under NT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 229–304

Title

Short Crop Rotation under No-Till Improves Crop Productivity and Soil Quality in Salt Affected Areas

Aziz Nurbekov; Muhammadjon Kosimov; Makhmud Shaumarov; et al. Agronomy 2023. doi:10.3390/agronomy13122974

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-c08873d0edff077f5bc99bbda3af40190cecbe24f6a3deff18e8ac85e0271ad3 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

97 papers: 79 positive, 18 negative or no effect

78 papers in the same direction as this claim · 16 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

88 papers more in this group

See all 97 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.