Claim · model-written summary
No till raised maize yield by 19.1% in the second cycle.
Zea maysNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“maize 19.1%”
e1“A further crop productivity increase was observed at the second experiment cycle during 2021–2023 under NT when compared to CT”
Title
Short Crop Rotation under No-Till Improves Crop Productivity and Soil Quality in Salt Affected Areas
Aziz Nurbekov; Muhammadjon Kosimov; Makhmud Shaumarov; et al. Agronomy 2023. doi:10.3390/agronomy13122974
Other claims from this paper (13)
- Intervention effect No till raised winter wheat yield by 9.63% in the first cycle.
- Intervention effect No till raised millet yield by 9.9% in the first cycle.
- Intervention effect No till raised chickpea yield by 3.8% in the first cycle.
- Intervention effect No till raised maize yield by 10.7% in the first cycle.
- Intervention effect No till raised winter wheat yield by 17.7% in the second cycle.
- Intervention effect No till raised millet yield by 31.2% in the second cycle.
- Intervention effect No till raised chickpea yield by 19.6% in the second cycle.
- Intervention effect No till raised total plant residue by 20.9%.
- Intervention effect No till raised root residue by 25%.
- Intervention effect No till improved soil porosity, structural stability and water retention.
- Intervention effect No till reduced soil salinity buildup by 18.9% at 0–25 cm.
- Intervention effect No till reduced soil salinity buildup by 32.9% at 75–100 cm.
- Intervention effect No till increased total nitrogen and phosphorus forms.