Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Sakha-1 seed yield increased by 33.0 under compost and biostimulant treatment versus control.

A claim from Synergistic effect of organic amendments and biostimulants on faba bean grown under sandy soil conditions · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sakha-1 seed yield increased by 33.0 under compost and biostimulant treatment versus control.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Material
Sakha-1e0
Treatment
plant compost applied as an organic amendment and 1.5 L ha -1 of biostimulants (VIUSID agro) with foliar applicatione0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
33.0e0
Qualifier
irrigation water affected by saltse0
Comparator
controle0
Setting
sandy soile0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor role

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–71
e0

“The results showed that the treatment of plant compost applied as an organic amendment and 1.5 L ha -1 of biostimulants (VIUSID agro) with foliar application significantly increased seed yield of cultivars, Sakha-4, Sakha-1, and Giza-843 by 17.2, 33.0, and 19.8 % respectively, compared to control under a sandy soil and irrigation water affected by salts.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–1054

Title

Synergistic effect of organic amendments and biostimulants on faba bean grown under sandy soil conditions

Mohamed S. Abbas; Ramadan A. Badawy; Hashim M. Abdel-Lattif; et al. Scientia Agricola 2021. doi:10.1590/1678-992x-2020-0300

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-c16ea995477e3ac2c29b38f78ff1f7fe87083fb7bac9e5df68c53eed7649229f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

organic · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

other · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 32 positive, 7 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

30 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

application · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

116 papers: 110 positive, 6 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. positive
  8. positive

107 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.