Intervention effectmodel-written summary

2,4-D injuries did not affect soybean yield components.

A claim from Simulated drift of dicamba and 2,4-D on soybeans: effects of application dose and time · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2,4-D injuries did not affect soybean yield components.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
2,4-De0
Outcome
yield componentse0
Direction
neither enough to damage crop nor affecte0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dicamba underdoses caused damage to soybean crop affecting its vegetative growth and yield; the injuries caused by 2,4-D were neither enough to damage crop nor affect yield components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–790

Title

Simulated drift of dicamba and 2,4-D on soybeans: effects of application dose and time

Estevam Matheus Costa; Adriano Jakelaitis; Jacson Zuchi; et al. Bioscience Journal 2020. doi:10.14393/bj-v36n3a2020-47742

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-c19c0c36ca3ffb69aa00ee12b0cdb66b8debd76a150cba817374e75df66ef167 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

2,4-D · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

31 papers: 8 positive, 23 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.