Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Reduced irrigation increased harvest index by 13% when ozone treatments were pooled.

A claim from Can Reduced Irrigation Mitigate Ozone Impacts on an Ozone-Sensitive African Wheat Variety? · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced irrigation increased harvest index by 13% when ozone treatments were pooled.

Material
Kenyan wheat varietye3
Treatment
Reduced irrigatione1
Outcome
harvest indexe1
Direction
stimulatede1
Value
13%e1
Qualifier
when O3 treatments were poolede1
Comparator
well-watered plantse2
Setting
solardomese5

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor role

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“an Ozone-Sensitive African Wheat Variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–89
e3

“an O3-sensitive Kenyan wheat variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–523
e1

“Reduced irrigation stimulated 1000-grain weight and harvest index by 33% and 13%, respectively (when O3 treatments were pooled)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–874
e2

“compensated for the O3-induced reductions observed in well-watered plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–955
e5

“for four weeks in solardomes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–595

Title

Can Reduced Irrigation Mitigate Ozone Impacts on an Ozone-Sensitive African Wheat Variety?

Harry Harmens; Felicity Hayes; Katrina Sharps; et al. Plants 2019. doi:10.3390/plants8070220

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-c1bc865b98303df14a2fba57026d876b56d249f4875e0e061db7154f2b9cb25f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.