Claim · model-written summary
Coating suppressed surface browning compared with control.
- Taxon
- aril‐sacse0
- Treatment
- coated aril‐sacse0
- Outcome
- surface browning developmente0
- Direction
- suppressede0
- Comparator
- control sacse0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“surface browning development was significantly suppressed in the coated aril‐sacs compared with control sacs.”
Title
Sbulelo Mwelase; Umezuruike L. Opara; Olaniyi A. Fawole Journal of Food Processing and Preservation 2022. doi:10.1111/jfpp.17096
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Intervention effect Coating delayed aril weight loss.
- Intervention effect Coating delayed the rise in respiration rate.
- Intervention effect Coating retained higher aril chroma, ascorbic acid and anthocyanin content.
- Intervention effect Coating retained higher DPPH scavenging activity and FRAP antioxidant power.
- Association Coating effectiveness depended on melatonin concentration.
- Recommendation Authors recommend CH+0.8–1 mM MT to suppress disorders and maintain aril quality.
- Intervention effect Adding melatonin improved chitosan coating effectiveness.