Intervention effectmodel-written summary

DPRN gave 8.6–13.5% higher grain yield than SPHN across two light conditions.

A claim from Dense planting with reducing nitrogen rate increased grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency in two hybrid rice varieties across two light conditions · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DPRN gave 8.6–13.5% higher grain yield than SPHN across two light conditions.

Taxon
hybrid riceOryza sativat1
Treatment
DPRNe4
Outcome
grain yielde4
Direction
highere4
Value
8.6–13.5%e4
Comparator
SPHNe4
Setting
two light conditionse4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“hybrid rice varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–121
e4

“Interestingly, 8.6–13.5% higher grain yield, and better performance of yield components and N use efficiency were observed from DPRN than SPHN across two light conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–1028

Title

Dense planting with reducing nitrogen rate increased grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency in two hybrid rice varieties across two light conditions

Xiaobing Xie; Shuanglü Shan; Yumei Wang; et al. Field Crops Research 2019. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2019.03.010

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-c51182a2c819f8b377e7bfa24133f1c64c56425c2139fde73eb2f92217032225 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2,045 papers: 1,803 positive, 242 negative or no effect

1,802 papers in the same direction as this claim · 193 in the opposite direction · 49 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

2,036 papers more in this group

See all 2,045 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.