Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Zn, Fe, B and Cu spray gave the maximum total soluble solids, acid ratio, sugar and phenol content in sweet orange.

A claim from Micronutrients spray to combat granulation and improve fruit quality of sweet orange [Citrus sinensis(L.) Osbeck] cv. Mosambi under nontraditional citrus growing track · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn, Fe, B and Cu spray gave the maximum total soluble solids, acid ratio, sugar and phenol content in sweet orange.

Taxon
sweet orangeCitrus sinensist0
Treatment
Zn @0.5% + Fe @0.2% + B @0.3% + Cu @0.1% spraye4
Outcome
total soluble solids (TSS): acid ratio, sugar, and phenol contente4
Direction
maximume4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Micronutrients spray to combat granulation and improve fruit quality of sweet orange”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–84
e4

“Fruit quality attributes in terms of total soluble solids (TSS): acid ratio, sugar, and phenol content were recorded maximum in Zn @0.5% + Fe @0.2% + B @0.3% + Cu @0.1% spray”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–1021

Title

Micronutrients spray to combat granulation and improve fruit quality of sweet orange [Citrus sinensis(L.) Osbeck] cv. Mosambi under nontraditional citrus growing track

Kumari Nandita; Manoj Kundu; Sareeta Nahakpam; et al. Journal of Plant Nutrition 2023. doi:10.1080/01904167.2023.2224384

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-c548e9c0d7780deeeb721b4ff982c1d7e6466fb224d5672bce1ae37ce144fc27 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

iron atom · quality: sugar starch · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive
See all 9 papers →

zinc atom · quality: sugar starch · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 10 papers →

copper atom · quality: sugar starch · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.