Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Irrigation at 6 cm and 1.2 IW/CPE gave significantly superior plant growth characters over 4 cm and 0.8 IW/CPE.

A claim from Effect of irrigation scheduling under different crop establishment methods on growth and water productivity of wheat · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 6 cm and 1.2 IW/CPE gave significantly superior plant growth characters over 4 cm and 0.8 IW/CPE.

Treatment
6 cm irrigation at 1.2 IW/CPEe1
Outcome
plant growth charactere1
Direction
significantly superiore1
Comparator
4 cm irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE ratioe1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“water productivity of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–116
e1

“in case of plant growth character like plant height, number of tillers, dry matter accumulation and LAI, there were no any significant difference were found between 5 cm irrigation at 1.0 IW/CPE and 6 cm irrigation at 1.2 IW/CPE and both treatments were found significantly superior over 4 cm irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1334–1657

Title

Effect of irrigation scheduling under different crop establishment methods on growth and water productivity of wheat

Saurabh Pratap Singh; Pravesh Kumar; Hari Om; et al. International Journal of Research in Agronomy 2024. doi:10.33545/2618060x.2024.v7.i10sb.1710

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-c83c9da54ab8b207ca233ccdc71f4a8cbb7bcdd8dc24fbc3d7138891e3255b6b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

irrigation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

242 papers: 177 positive, 65 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this claim · 61 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

233 papers more in this group

See all 242 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.