Claim · model-written summary
Ethephon overcame negative auxin effects.
- Taxon
- Apple
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- ethephone0
- Outcome
- negative effectse0
- Direction
- overcamee0
- Comparator
- auxin treatmentse0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“ethephon overcame the negative effects of the auxin treatments”
t0“Apple Blossoms”
Title
Sunghee Guak; Michael Beulah; Norman E. Looney; et al. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 2002. doi:10.21273/jashs.127.2.165
Other claims from this paper (12)
- Intervention effect MCPB-ethyl increased whole flower cluster removal with rate up to 20 mg per liter.
- Intervention effect NAA increased whole flower cluster removal with rate up to 21 mg per liter.
- Intervention effect MCPB-ethyl did not thin apple blossoms in the Corvallis experiment.
- Intervention effect Auxin treatments did not consistently reduce fruit set on remaining clusters.
- Intervention effect Ethephon with NAA further reduced crop load.
- Intervention effect Carbaryl reduced crop load by increasing whole cluster removal and single-fruit sites.
- Intervention effect Auxin treatments generally did not improve return flowering except with excessive crop reduction.
- Intervention effect Ethephon promoted return flowering.
- Intervention effect Carbaryl promoted return flowering more strongly than ethephon.
- Intervention effect Bloom-time auxin countered carbaryl promotion of return flowering.
- Intervention effect Combined ethephon and carbaryl reduced crop load.
- Intervention effect Combined ethephon and carbaryl benefited return flowering.