Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Two Carbendazim sprays gave the greatest reduction in spot blotch incidence and severity.

A claim from Management of spot blotch of wheat using Fungicides, Bio-agents and Botanicals · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two Carbendazim sprays gave the greatest reduction in spot blotch incidence and severity.

Organ / stage
tillering and boot leaf stagee0
Treatment
Two sprays of Carbendazim at 0.1%e0
Outcome
spot blotch incidence and severitye0
Direction
maximum reductione0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two sprays of Carbendazim at 0.1% at tillering and boot leaf stage resulted in the maximum reduction in spot blotch incidence and severity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 227–365
e1

“seed yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–225

Title

Management of spot blotch of wheat using Fungicides, Bio-agents and Botanicals

Yadav Bikesh; Singh Ramji; Kumar Adesh African Journal of Agricultural Research 2015. doi:10.5897/ajar2013.8196

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-c8e1da48b8a75d7533e73da34a6d5182562d4f08a279f1244eb5b3485501c600 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

carbendazim · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 15 positive, 5 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

application · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

100 papers: 83 positive, 17 negative or no effect

82 papers in the same direction as this claim · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

91 papers more in this group

See all 100 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.