Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Low P enhanced maize exodermis establishment.

A claim from Exodermis and Endodermis Respond to Nutrient Deficiency in Nutrient-Specific and Localized Manner · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low P enhanced maize exodermis establishment.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
low-Pe0
Outcome
establishment of the exodermise0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“establishment of the exodermis was enhanced in low-N and low-P plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–821
e1

“exodermal and endodermal differentiation in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–518

Title

Exodermis and Endodermis Respond to Nutrient Deficiency in Nutrient-Specific and Localized Manner

Jiří Namyslov; Zuzana Bauriedlová; Jana Janoušková; et al. Plants 2020. doi:10.3390/plants9020201

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-ca2aecbb6e048f4af5035994a5f5ad4c471d4c10400f30f927b0c649173b413f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

phosphorus · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

306 papers: 252 positive, 54 negative or no effect

251 papers in the same direction as this claim · 51 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Growth was diminished under drought with prohexadione-Ca treatment alone.

    Participation of abscisic acid and gibberellins produced by endophyticAzospirillumin the alleviation of drought effects in maize · 2009

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Supplemental N and P did not alleviate crop growth inhibition.

    Allelopathic Effects of Annual Weed Residues on Growth and Nutrient Uptake of Corn and Soybeans1 · 1984

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Emergence m-2 was not significantly affected by nitrogen and phosphorus levels.

    Effect of Different Levels of Nitrogen and Phosphorus on the Phenology and Yield of Maize Varieties · 2014

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Phosphorus deprivation rapidly and strongly reduced leaf expansion.

    Maize root system growth and development as influenced by phosphorus deficiency · 1999 · compared with P deprivation

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Phosphorus deprivation decreased maize shoot fresh weight.

    Phosphate Deficiency in Maize. V. Mobilization of Nitrogen and Phosphorus within Shoots of Young Plants and its Relationship to Senescence · 1995

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Phosphorus and zinc foliar spray had no effect on dry matter yield of forage maize.

    The effects of a foliar spray containing phosphorus and zinc on the development, composition and yield of forage maize · 2001

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Under severe dehydration, pressurization induced only brief elongation and slight growth-induced water-potential response.

    Root pressurization affects growth-induced water potentials and growth in dehydrated maize leaves · 2003

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Increasing soil P supply decreased shoot dry matter by 10% in wheat and 23% in maize.

    The effects of increased phosphorus application on shoot dry matter, shoot P and Zn concentrations in wheat (Triticum durum L.) and maize (Zea mays L.) grown in a calcareous soil · 2010 · compared with control treatment

    Opposite direction

297 papers more in this group

See all 306 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.