Paper · 1984 · Agronomy Journal

Allelopathic Effects of Annual Weed Residues on Growth and Nutrient Uptake of Corn and Soybeans1

P. C. Bhowmik; J. D. Doll

13
claims
19
verbatim quotes
85
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Annual weeds have shown allelopathic potential in recent years. Few studies clearly compare effects of weed residues on growth inhibition and nutrient uptake in corn ( Zea mays L.) and soybeans [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. Therefore, the residues (aboveground biomass) of common lambsquarters ( Chenopodium album L.), redroot pigweed ( Amaranthus retroflexus L.), common ragweed ( Ambrosia artemisifolia L.), velvetleaf ( Abutilon theophrasti Medic.), and yellow foxtail [ Setaria glauca (L.) Beauv.] were evaluated for their allelopathic effects on growth and uptake of N, P, and K in corn and soybeans in controlled environments. Weed residues in silica sand produced more inhibitory effects than the mixture of soil (Typic Agriudoll) and sand. The growth inhibition was more (8 to 14%) when the residues were incorporated in all soils than when they were surface applied. All residues except common ragweed reduced corn (6 to 20%) and soybean (2 to 20%) dry matter production. The inhibition or stimulation of N, P, and K uptake in both crops was not consistent and depended on the residue source, residue placement, or soil texture. Addition of supplemental N and P to various residues provided no alleviating effect on crop growth. Addition of P markedly enhanced P uptake without affecting total dry weights of both test species when compared to the controls. Yellow foxtail and common ragweed residues increased K uptake (21 to 48%) in corn but not in soybeans. The weed residues demonstrated an allelopathic inhibition of growth independent of N and P nutrition, and suggest that the inhibitory effects are not related to nutrient uptake.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed residues inhibited growth more in silica sand than in soil and sand mixture.

Treatment
Weed residuese0
Outcome
inhibitory effectse0
Direction
more inhibitorye0
Comparator
mixture of soil (Typic Agriudoll) and sande0
Setting
silica sande0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed residues in silica sand produced more inhibitory effects than the mixture of soil (Typic Agriudoll) and sand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–752 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.) and soybeans [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 170–228 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Incorporated residues inhibited growth 8 to 14% more than surface-applied residues.

Treatment
residues were incorporatede0
Outcome
growth inhibitione0
Direction
moree0
Value
8 to 14%e0
Comparator
surface appliede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The growth inhibition was more (8 to 14%) when the residues were incorporated in all soils than when they were surface applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–880 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.) and soybeans [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 170–228 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All residues except common ragweed reduced corn dry matter by 6 to 20%.

Treatment
All residues except common ragweede0
Outcome
dry matter productione0
Direction
reducede0
Value
6 to 20%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All residues except common ragweed reduced corn (6 to 20%) and soybean (2 to 20%) dry matter production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–985 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All residues except common ragweed reduced soybean dry matter by 2 to 20%.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
All residues except common ragweede0
Outcome
dry matter productione0
Direction
reducede0
Value
2 to 20%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All residues except common ragweed reduced corn (6 to 20%) and soybean (2 to 20%) dry matter production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–985 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residue source, placement and soil texture conditioned N, P and K uptake responses.

Treatment
residue source, residue placement, or soil texturee0
Outcome
N, P, and K uptakee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inhibition or stimulation of N, P, and K uptake in both crops was not consistent and depended on the residue source, residue placement, or soil texture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1142 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.) and soybeans [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 170–228 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Supplemental N and P did not alleviate crop growth inhibition.

Treatment
Addition of supplemental N and Pe0
Outcome
crop growthe0
Direction
no alleviating effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Addition of supplemental N and P to various residues provided no alleviating effect on crop growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1242 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.) and soybeans [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 170–228 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Added P markedly enhanced P uptake.

Treatment
Addition of Pe0
Outcome
P uptakee0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Addition of P markedly enhanced P uptake without affecting total dry weights of both test species when compared to the controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1371 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.) and soybeans [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 170–228 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Added P did not affect total dry weight.

Treatment
Addition of Pe0
Outcome
total dry weightse0
Direction
without affectinge0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Addition of P markedly enhanced P uptake without affecting total dry weights of both test species when compared to the controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1371 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.) and soybeans [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 170–228 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yellow foxtail residues increased corn K uptake by 21 to 48%.

Treatment
Yellow foxtaile0
Interactor
Yellow foxtailSetaria pumilae0weed
Outcome
K uptakee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
21 to 48%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Setaria pumila
Setaria pumila · InteractorAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yellow foxtail and common ragweed residues increased K uptake (21 to 48%) in corn but not in soybeans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1373–1474 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Common ragweed residues increased corn K uptake by 21 to 48%.

Treatment
common ragweed residuese0
Interactor
common ragweedAmbrosia artemisiifoliae0weed
Outcome
K uptakee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
21 to 48%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ambrosia artemisiifolia
Ambrosia artemisiifolia · InteractorDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yellow foxtail and common ragweed residues increased K uptake (21 to 48%) in corn but not in soybeans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1373–1474 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yellow foxtail residues did not increase soybean K uptake.

Taxon
soybeansGlycine maxe0
Treatment
Yellow foxtaile0
Interactor
Yellow foxtailSetaria pumilae0weed
Outcome
K uptakee0
Direction
note0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Setaria pumila
Setaria pumila · InteractorAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yellow foxtail and common ragweed residues increased K uptake (21 to 48%) in corn but not in soybeans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1373–1474 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Common ragweed residues did not increase soybean K uptake.

Taxon
soybeansGlycine maxe0
Treatment
common ragweed residuese0
Interactor
common ragweedAmbrosia artemisiifoliae0weed
Outcome
K uptakee0
Direction
note0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ambrosia artemisiifolia
Ambrosia artemisiifolia · InteractorDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yellow foxtail and common ragweed residues increased K uptake (21 to 48%) in corn but not in soybeans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1373–1474 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors inferred allelopathic growth inhibition independent of N and P nutrition.

Taxon
weede0
Treatment
weed residuese0
Outcome
inhibition of growthe0
Qualifier
independent of N and P nutritione0

Verbatim

e0

“The weed residues demonstrated an allelopathic inhibition of growth independent of N and P nutrition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1476–1576 · show in text ↑

Ambrosia artemisiifolia · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Ambrosia artemisiifolia · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

phosphorus · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

306 papers: 252 positive, 54 negative or no effect

53 papers in the same direction as this paper · 252 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

302 papers more in this group

See all 306 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

748 papers: 619 positive, 129 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 619 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

744 papers more in this group

See all 748 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.