Intervention effectmodel-written summary

When ethephon was used with supplementary irrigation it increased grain yield, spikes per square metre and earliness of barley.

A claim from Effect of Ethephon Spraying at Three Developmental Stages of Barley Planted in Arid and Semiarid Mediterranean Locations · 2002

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

When ethephon was used with supplementary irrigation it increased grain yield, spikes per square metre and earliness of barley.

Treatment
ethephon was used with supplementary irrigatione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–67
e0

“when ethephon was used with supplementary irrigation it was found to increase grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1187

Title

Effect of Ethephon Spraying at Three Developmental Stages of Barley Planted in Arid and Semiarid Mediterranean Locations

A. F. Al‐Jamali; M. A. Turk; A. R. M. Tawaha Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 2002. doi:10.1046/j.1439-037x.2002.00568.x

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-ca2fd4510a4cb4459f2c64ed049e5c41504dd0be92426d9206bae165b793f5d6 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ

31 papers: 22 positive, 9 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

22 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

irrigation · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ

109 papers: 83 positive, 26 negative or no effect

82 papers in the same direction as this claim · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

100 papers more in this group

See all 109 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.