Claim · model-written summary
Rice residue retention increased wheat GY.
Triticum aestivumNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wheat”
e0“RRR increased wheat GY (5224 kg ha−1), above-ground biomass (AGBM = 11.9 t ha−1), tillers per square meter (TPM = 469) and grains per meter square (GrPMS = 13,917) significantly”
Title
Raj Pal Meena; Karnam Venkatesh; Rinki Khobra; et al. Agronomy 2020. doi:10.3390/agronomy10030434
Other claims from this paper (16)
- Intervention effect Rice residue retention increased above-ground biomass.
- Intervention effect Rice residue retention increased tillers per square meter.
- Intervention effect Rice residue retention increased grains per meter square.
- Intervention effect Rice residue retention increased Relative water content.
- Intervention effect Rice residue retention increased WUE.
- Intervention effect Foliar K increased GY.
- Intervention effect Foliar K increased AGBM.
- Intervention effect Foliar K increased RWC.
- Intervention effect Foliar K increased SPAD.
- Intervention effect Foliar K increased WUE.
- Intervention effect Foliar K increased net returns.
- Intervention effect Foliar K increased BC ratio.
- Intervention effect Residue retention increased grain yield by 15.66% with one CRI irrigation.
- Intervention effect Residue retention increased WUE by 17.39% with one CRI irrigation.
- Observation Residue retention yielded 151 $ additional revenue with one CRI irrigation.
- Observation Adoption of residue retention over 10% of area could earn 187 million-US$ annually.