Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Diatomaceous Earth fertilizer produced a linear biomass increase in sugarcane.

A claim from Efficiency and recovery index of silicon of a diatomaceous Earth-based fertilizer in two soil types grown with sugarcane and maize · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diatomaceous Earth fertilizer produced a linear biomass increase in sugarcane.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
DE fertilizer applicatione0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
linear increasee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“DE fertilizer application provided linear increase in the biomass of sugarcane and maize in the tested soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–835

Title

Efficiency and recovery index of silicon of a diatomaceous Earth-based fertilizer in two soil types grown with sugarcane and maize

Clístenes Williams Araújo do Nascimento; Fernando Bruno Vieira da Silva; Paula Renata Muniz Araújo; et al. Journal of Plant Nutrition 2021. doi:10.1080/01904167.2021.1918157

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-ca5d31ec1ae84ca64e5a34e7ffa7db6833c93381a78d361c7cf7b2f6ef8c30ad · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

fertilization · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

147 papers: 129 positive, 18 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this claim · 14 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Within-row compost significantly reduced root surface area versus control.

    Gypsum and Compost Effects on Sugarcane Root Growth, Yield, and Plant Nutrients · 2002 · compared with the control

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Municipal waste composts had no effect or harmed sugarcane growth.

    Organic Material Soil Amendment Effects on Root Rot and Sugarcane Growth and Characterization of the Materials · 1999

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Planting fertilizer percentages did not increase tillering at Morrinhos-GO.

    Yield and biometry of fertilized sugar cane with organomineral fertilizer of sewage sludge and biostimulant · 2020

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Field fresh weight was comparable across nitrogen treatments.

    Impact of urea fertilization rates on nitrogen losses, productivity and profitability in East African sugarcane plantations · 2024

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Green manuring reduced sugarcane biomass accumulation by 7 to 16%.

    Effect of intercropped prickly sesban (Sesbania cannabina) green-manure and nitrogen levels on growth and yield of sugarcane. · 2003

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Fertilizer combinations did not significantly affect germination, CCS or sugar recovery.

    Comparative efficiency of solid and liquid fertilizers in sugarcane · 2009

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Grower habitual fertilizer was the costliest and had inferior germination.

    Fertilizer Effects on Mechanization Wide Row Spacing Sugarcane · 2009

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Different manure applications had no significant effect on sugarcane growth height and stem diameter.

    Effects of Sugarcane Intercropping with Potato on the Sugarcane Yield and Quality · 2013

    Opposite direction

138 papers more in this group

See all 147 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.