Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Diatomaceous Earth gave higher relative biomass yield than calcium silicate.

A claim from Efficiency and recovery index of silicon of a diatomaceous Earth-based fertilizer in two soil types grown with sugarcane and maize · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diatomaceous Earth gave higher relative biomass yield than calcium silicate.

Taxon
sugarcane and maizet0
Treatment
DE fertilizere0
Outcome
relative biomass yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
calcium silicate sourcee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“When compared to the calcium silicate source, the DE fertilizer provided the same Si supplying potential for the tested plants and higher relative biomass yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1203
t0

“sugarcane and maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–130

Title

Efficiency and recovery index of silicon of a diatomaceous Earth-based fertilizer in two soil types grown with sugarcane and maize

Clístenes Williams Araújo do Nascimento; Fernando Bruno Vieira da Silva; Paula Renata Muniz Araújo; et al. Journal of Plant Nutrition 2021. doi:10.1080/01904167.2021.1918157

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-0ff0c81669e95ef4910672da5ed99e9f2caaab21892dd808acbfaee5ad3cb1c8 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

diatomaceous earth · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

diatomaceous earth · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
See all 6 papers →

fertilization · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

346 papers: 312 positive, 34 negative or no effect

311 papers in the same direction as this claim · 28 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

337 papers more in this group

See all 346 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.