Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Main nutrient contents were largely unaffected in both species.

A claim from Wild olive and holm oak response to a fulvic amendment application on soils polluted by trace elements · 2004

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Main nutrient contents were largely unaffected in both species.

Treatment
fulvic amendment applicationt0
Outcome
main nutrient contentse0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea var. sylvestris
Olea europaea var. sylvestris · Taxon · picture of the speciesHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The main nutrient contents were basically not affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–896
t0

“Wild olive and holm oak response to a fulvic amendment application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–66

Title

Wild olive and holm oak response to a fulvic amendment application on soils polluted by trace elements

P. Madejón; J. M. Murillo Forest Systems 2004. doi:10.5424/srf/2004133-00852

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-ca8127b2cd64d8d510010eaaddc32f85a3f8e24b205786f21cf8a0f31f265cd9 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

other · nutrient: content · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.