Claim · model-written summary
Amended wild olives grew better in polluted soils than in unaffected soil.
- Taxon
- wild olives
Olea europaea var. sylvestrise0 - Treatment
- treated with the amendmente0
- Outcome
- growthe0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- an unaffected soile0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the growth of the wild olives treated with the amendment was better in the affected soils than in an unaffected soil used for comparison.”
Title
P. Madejón; J. M. Murillo Forest Systems 2004. doi:10.5424/srf/2004133-00852
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Intervention effect The amendment slightly increased leaf trace-element concentrations in wild olive.
- Intervention effect The amendment slightly increased leaf trace-element concentrations in holm oak.
- Intervention effect Main nutrient contents were largely unaffected in both species.
- Intervention effect Wild olive leaf nitrogen increased significantly.
- Intervention effect Wild olive chlorophyll increased with amendment.
- Intervention effect Holm oak chlorophyll increased with amendment.
- Observation The authors infer no phytotoxicity from the amendment on polluted soils.