Paper · 2021 · The Science of The Total Environment

Plant response to mycorrhizal inoculation and amendments on a contaminated soil

Paula Madejón; Carmen M. Navarro-Fernández; Engracia Madejón; et al.

9
claims
15
verbatim quotes
20
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Understanding the combined effects of soil amendments and inoculation of mycorrhizal fungi on the response of different plant species during the phytostabilization process of trace elements contaminated soils is a challenge. This task is more difficult but more realistic when studied under field conditions. We assess the combined effects of two amendment doses and mycorrhizal inoculation on the response of saplings of two tree species planted in a contaminated field. The amendments were a mix of sugar beet lime and biosolid compost. The inoculation treatments were made with a commercial inoculum of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for wild olive and ectomycorrhizal fungi for stone pine. Results showed a weak or null effect of the mycorrhizal inoculation on plant growth, survival and trace element accumulation. There was a significant increase on P nutrition for stone pine, growing on non-amended conditions. Soil amendments were very effective reducing trace elements availability and their accumulation in both plant species, especially in roots. However, the effects on plant biomass were species-dependent and contrasted; low-dose amendments increased the biomass of wild olive by 33.3%, but reduced by 28% that of pine. The high doses of amendments (60 T ha−1) produced some negative effects on plant growth and nutrition, probably related to the increase of soil salinity. Both plant species, stone pine and wild olive, have been proved to be adequate for phytostabilization of contaminated soils under Mediterranean climate, due to their drought tolerance and the low transfer of trace elements from root to shoot, thus reducing toxicity for the food web. To implement microbial-assisted phytoremediation approaches, a better understanding of the diversity and ecology of plant-associated microorganisms is needed. The use of indigenous fungi, locally adapted and tolerant to contamination, would be more suitable for phytostabilization purposes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal inoculation had a weak or null effect on growth, survival and trace element accumulation of tree saplings.

Taxon
two tree speciese1
Treatment
mycorrhizal inoculatione2
Interactor
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungie3symbiont
Second interactor
ectomycorrhizal fungie3symbiont
Outcome
plant growth, survival and trace element accumulatione2
Direction
weak or null effecte2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“the response of saplings of two tree species planted in a contaminated field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 394–470 · show in text ↑
e2

“Results showed a weak or null effect of the mycorrhizal inoculation on plant growth, survival and trace element accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–816 · show in text ↑
e3

“The inoculation treatments were made with a commercial inoculum of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for wild olive and ectomycorrhizal fungi for stone pine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 539–690 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Stone pine showed a significant increase in P nutrition when growing on non-amended conditions.

Taxon
stone pinePinus pineae4
Outcome
P nutritione4
Direction
increasee4
Setting
non-amended conditionse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus pinea
Pinus pinea · TaxonLivioandronico2013 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“There was a significant increase on P nutrition for stone pine, growing on non-amended conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–915 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil amendments reduced trace element availability and accumulation in both tree species, especially in roots.

Taxon
two tree speciese1
Organ / stage
rootse5
Treatment
Soil amendmentse5
Outcome
trace elements availability and their accumulatione5
Direction
reducinge5

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“the response of saplings of two tree species planted in a contaminated field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 394–470 · show in text ↑
e5

“Soil amendments were very effective reducing trace elements availability and their accumulation in both plant species, especially in roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–1055 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low-dose amendments increased wild olive biomass by 33.3%.

Treatment
low-dose amendmentse6
Outcome
biomasse6
Direction
increasede6
Value
33.3%e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea var. sylvestris
Olea europaea var. sylvestris · Taxon · picture of the speciesHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“low-dose amendments increased the biomass of wild olive by 33.3%, but reduced by 28% that of pine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1231 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low-dose amendments reduced stone pine biomass by 28%.

Taxon
pinePinuse6
Treatment
low-dose amendmentse6
Outcome
biomasse6
Direction
reducede6
Value
28%e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus
Pinus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest Service Northern Region from Missoula, MT, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“low-dose amendments increased the biomass of wild olive by 33.3%, but reduced by 28% that of pine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1231 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High doses of amendments (60 T ha−1) produced negative effects on tree growth and nutrition.

Taxon
two tree speciese1
Treatment
high doses of amendmentse7
Outcome
plant growth and nutritione7
Direction
negative effectse7
Value
60 T ha−1e7

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“the response of saplings of two tree species planted in a contaminated field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 394–470 · show in text ↑
e7

“The high doses of amendments (60 T ha−1) produced some negative effects on plant growth and nutrition, probably related to the increase of soil salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1385 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The negative effects of high amendment doses are probably related to increased soil salinity.

Taxon
two tree speciese1
Treatment
high doses of amendmentse7
Outcome
plant growth and nutritione7
Qualifier
increase of soil salinitye7

Verbatim

e1

“the response of saplings of two tree species planted in a contaminated field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 394–470 · show in text ↑
e7

“The high doses of amendments (60 T ha−1) produced some negative effects on plant growth and nutrition, probably related to the increase of soil salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1385 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Stone pine and wild olive are adequate for phytostabilization of contaminated soils under Mediterranean climate.

Taxon
stone pine and wild olivePinus pineaOlea europaea var. sylvestrise7
Outcome
adequate for phytostabilization of contaminated soilse7
Setting
under Mediterranean climatee7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus pinea
Pinus pinea · TaxonLivioandronico2013 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Olea europaea var. sylvestris
Olea europaea var. sylvestris · Taxon · picture of the speciesHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Both plant species, stone pine and wild olive, have been proved to be adequate for phytostabilization of contaminated soils under Mediterranean climate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1387–1538 · show in text ↑
Recommendationhypothesisoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Indigenous fungi would be more suitable than introduced inoculants for phytostabilization with tree species.

Taxon
two tree speciese1
Interactor
indigenous fungie6symbiont
Outcome
more suitable for phytostabilization purposese6

Verbatim

e1

“the response of saplings of two tree species planted in a contaminated field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 394–470 · show in text ↑
e6

“The use of indigenous fungi, locally adapted and tolerant to contamination, would be more suitable for phytostabilization purposes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1830–1960 · show in text ↑

other · growth · PinusPositive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

other · growth · Olea europaea (common olive)Results agree

20 papers: 20 positive, 0 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.