Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Preemergence mesotrione did not reduce sweet corn plant height or yield.

A claim from Sweet Corn (Zea mays) Cultivar Sensitivity to Mesotrione* · 2002

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preemergence mesotrione did not reduce sweet corn plant height or yield.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
PRE applications of mesotrionee0
Outcome
plant height or yielde0
Direction
no injury, or reductionse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“There was no injury, or reductions in plant height or yield with PRE applications of mesotrione at any location in either year.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–582
t0

“Sweet Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10

Title

Sweet Corn (Zea mays) Cultivar Sensitivity to Mesotrione*

JOHN O'SULLIVAN; JOHN ZANDSTRA; PETER SIKKEMA Weed Technology 2002. doi:10.1614/0890-037x(2002)016[0421:sczmcs]2.0.co;2

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-cb7edf0afad3976ed58e68b6b2557559465ec22638dc64f514a84161bdced9a8 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

mesotrione · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

29 papers: 21 positive, 8 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect
    Drone mesotrione plus atrazine with adjuvant was statistically on par with knapsack spraying for yield.

    Evaluation of post emergence herbicides spraying in maize (Zea mays L.) by using drone · 2024 · compared with T5- spraying of mesotrione 2.27% + atrazine 22.7% SC 875 g ha-1 (RM) by using knapsack sprayer

    No difference from an alternative

20 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

herbicide · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

651 papers: 500 positive, 151 negative or no effect

499 papers in the same direction as this claim · 127 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

642 papers more in this group

See all 651 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.