Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Sludge doses did not significantly change exogenous amino acids.

A claim from The Contents of Microelements and Exogenous Amino Acids in Spring Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Grain after Municipal Sewage Sludge Fertilization · 2012

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sludge doses did not significantly change exogenous amino acids.

Taxon
Spring WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Applied doses of sewage sludgee0
Outcome
exogenous amino acidse0
Direction
did not affect significantlye0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applied doses of sewage sludge did not affect significantly the contents of analyzed microelements or exogenous amino acids.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–982
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–71

Title

The Contents of Microelements and Exogenous Amino Acids in Spring Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Grain after Municipal Sewage Sludge Fertilization

Krzysztof Gondek; Michal Kopec; Tomasz Glab Journal of Agricultural Science 2012. doi:10.5539/jas.v4n12p294

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-cbb612cd0ef12bcf62144820138ea035ca86f9c8f63f4343375e2d4647bf6920 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

organic · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 19 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Substituting 50% of N through sewage sludge at 10 t ha-1 increased micronutrient availability.

    Effect of Sewage Sludge and Rice Straw Compost on Yield, Micronutrient Availability and Soil Quality under Rice–Wheat System · 2019

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
    Moving residue from the seed row alleviated high crown node set.

    Effect of Crop Residue Management and Tillage on Water Use Efficiency and Yield of Winter Wheat1 · 1982

    Opposite direction

  3. positive
    Returning the crop residue increased KMnO 4 –oxidizable C and the C management index in the wheat–maize system.

    Does Straw Return Strategy Influence Soil Carbon Sequestration and Labile Fractions? · 2019

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    CTS reduced greenhouse gas intensity by 18.72% relative to conventional tillage.

    Conservation tillage: a way to improve yield and soil properties and decrease global warming potential in spring wheat agroecosystems · 2024 · compared with CT

    Opposite direction

  5. positive
    Straw return increased total amino acids concentration by 1.2%.

    Straw return enhances grain yield and quality of three main crops: evidence from a meta-analysis · 2024 · compared with no straw return

    Opposite direction

  6. positive
    Continuous use of chemical fertilizers with organic amendments in a rice-wheat system for 19 years increased the availability of the micronutrient cations Zn, Fe, Mn and Cu.

    Micronutrients availability in soil–plant system as influenced by long-term integrated nutrient management under rice–wheat cropping · 2021

    Opposite direction

  7. positive
    Cattle manure, biogas and sewage sludge composts increased K concentration in wheat and barley straw.

    The influence of composts on yield and chemical elements of winter wheat and spring barley · 2016

    Opposite direction

  8. positive
    Incorporation of crop residue improved physical properties and organic matter content of the salt-affected Vertisols.

    Management of Salt-affected Vertisols with Sub-surface Drainage and Crop Residue Incorporation under Soybean-Wheat Cropping System · 2001

    Opposite direction

16 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.