Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Bacillus subtilis B-24 reduced apple anthracnose decay incidence and lesion diameter versus CK.

A claim from Influence of Propiconazole and Bacillus subtitle B-24 on the Control Effect of Postharvest Anthracnonse of Apple Fruit · 2008

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus subtilis B-24 reduced apple anthracnose decay incidence and lesion diameter versus CK.

Treatment
Bacillus subtilis B-24e0
Interactor
Bacillus subtilis B-24Bacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
decay incidence was low and lesion diameter was smalle0
Direction
lowe0
Comparator
CKe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–118
e0

“Bacillus subtilis B-24 and propiconazole had good control effect to apple anthracnose,there were significant difference(P=0.05) comparing with CK,the decay incidence was low and lesion diameter was small”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–750

Title

Influence of Propiconazole and Bacillus subtitle B-24 on the Control Effect of Postharvest Anthracnonse of Apple Fruit

Li Li Jiguang shengwu xuebao 2008

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-cc648df00a28cf7a2dd4ebffdc686f11f71f3e75714cea06b9bd64767f35f6a5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

Bacillus subtilis · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.