Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Acid Norfolk and Greenville soils no apparent detrimental effect peanut roots in growth chambers.

A claim from Differential Response of Cotton and Peanuts to Subsoil Acidity1 · 1970

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acid Norfolk and Greenville soils no apparent detrimental effect peanut roots in growth chambers.

Treatment
acid Norfolk and Greenville subsoil materialse0
Outcome
peanut rootse0
Direction
no apparent detrimental effecte0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth‐chamber experiments with acid Norfolk and Greenville subsoil materials showed cotton root‐growth to be almost completely inhibited by soils that had no apparent detrimental effect on peanut roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–659

Title

Differential Response of Cotton and Peanuts to Subsoil Acidity1

Fred Adams; R. W. Pearson Agronomy Journal 1970. doi:10.2134/agronj1970.00021962006200010003x

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-cccaa34fcb076f388526427475c0b98033564c447544a996b0925cb6598b0a5e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

tillage · organism · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. no effect
See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.