Intervention effectmodel-written summary

AMF inoculation increased Zn, and Cu in the soil.

A claim from Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal inoculation and NPK fertilization on improving spoiled soil in brickfiled · 1999

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation increased Zn, and Cu in the soil.

Taxon
T. repensTrifolium repense0
Treatment
AMF inoculatione0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
Zn, and Cu in the soile0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AMF inoculation significantly increased the fresh and dry weight, N, P, K, Zn and Cu contents in plants of T. repens, and the total N, available P, Zn, and Cu in the soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–620

Title

Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal inoculation and NPK fertilization on improving spoiled soil in brickfiled

Liu Xin Ganhan diqu nongye yanjiu 1999

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-cccb07e87281bfe3694644fdea080056ca08a03a8c033080a86cc2e1b243e4f6 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

mycorrhiza · nutrient: content · Trifolium repens (white clover)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Trifolium repens (white clover)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.