Claim · model-written summary
Cluster shading did not affect sugar, acid, or potassium accumulation.
- Taxon
- Grapest0
- Treatment
- Shading clusterse0
- Outcome
- sugar, acid, or potassium accumulatione0
- Direction
- did not affecte0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“Shading clusters did not affect sugar, acid, or potassium accumulation”
t0“Cabernet Sauvignon Grapes”
Title
Janice C. Morrison; Ann C. Noble American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 1990. doi:10.5344/ajev.1990.41.3.193
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Intervention effect Leaf shading slowed berry growth and sugar accumulation.
- Intervention effect Leaf shading decreased pre-veraison malate accumulation.
- Intervention effect Leaf shading decreased the rate of post-veraison malate decline.
- Intervention effect Malate, potassium, and pH were higher at harvest after leaf shading.
- Intervention effect Cluster shading lowered anthocyanins and total soluble phenols.
- Intervention effect Total vine shading slowed tartrate accumulation.
- Intervention effect Total vine shading did not affect harvest tartrate content.
- Intervention effect Neither leaf nor cluster shading alone affected tartrate accumulation.
- Intervention effect Fresh grape aroma differed between controls and shade treatments.
- Intervention effect Wine aroma and flavor differed significantly between controls and three shading treatments.