Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The 187.5 kg Nlha plus FYM treatment increased wheat growth, nutrient uptake, available N and grain and straw yields significantly.

A claim from Effect of integrated nutrient management on productivity of wheat (Triticum aestivum) under limited and adequate irrigation supplies · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 187.5 kg Nlha plus FYM treatment increased wheat growth, nutrient uptake, available N and grain and straw yields significantly.

Treatment
187.5 kg Nlha + FYM (10 Vha)e0
Outcome
growth, nutrient uptake, available N and grain and straw yieldse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 187.5 kg Nlha + FYM (10 Vha) and 150 kg Nlha + FYM (1 0 Vha) + Azotobacter recorded significantly higher growth, nutrient uptake, available N and grain and straw yields of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–784

Title

Effect of integrated nutrient management on productivity of wheat (Triticum aestivum) under limited and adequate irrigation supplies

ABHlJlT SARMA; HARBIR SlNGH; R.K. NANWAL Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v52i2.4905

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-cd70c1ad4e1ac7eddec98d62f99f5cedd19daa98f0e85ce50acc8d0532496439 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this claim · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

3,429 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.