Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Compost suppressed P. penetrans in the first greenhouse experiment.

A claim from Non-fumigant alternative soil management practices for mitigating replant disease of fruit trees : mechanisms contributing to Pratylenchus penetrans suppression · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost suppressed P. penetrans in the first greenhouse experiment.

Taxon
apple and sweet cherry seedlingsMalus domesticaPrunus aviume0
Treatment
compost amendmentse0
Interactor
P. penetransPratylenchus penetranse0pest
Outcome
P. penetranse0
Direction
suppressede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pratylenchus penetrans
Pratylenchus penetrans · InteractorUSDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compost amendments, but not biocontrol inoculation, improved growth of apple and sweet cherry seedlings in old orchard soil, suppressed P. penetrans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–989

Title

Non-fumigant alternative soil management practices for mitigating replant disease of fruit trees : mechanisms contributing to Pratylenchus penetrans suppression

Watson, Tristan Tanner cIRcle (University of British Columbia) 2018. doi:10.14288/1.0365938

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-cd798e38143b0cc43ebdf9335b4ac6c4c6d472204dcba60ee7fb2c11a22f2900 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

other · Pratylenchus penetrans · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.