Claim · model-written summary
Late sowing increased lodging resistance by 49.6% versus normal sowing.
- Taxon
- winter wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- postponing the sowing datee0
- Outcome
- lodging resistancee0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 49.6%e0
- Comparator
- normal sowinge0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“postponing the sowing date significantly increased lodging resistance by 53.6% and 49.6% compared with that following early and normal sowing, respectively.”
t0“winter wheat”
Title
Xinglong Dai; Yuechao Wang; Xiuchun Dong; et al. The Crop Journal 2017. doi:10.1016/j.cj.2017.05.003
Other claims from this paper (12)
- Intervention effect Early and normal sowing did not differ significantly in lodging resistance, grain yield, or NUE.
- Intervention effect Late sowing increased lodging resistance by 53.6% versus early sowing.
- Mechanism Reduced culm height at the center of gravity contributed to improved lodging resistance.
- Mechanism Greater tensile strength of the base internode contributed to lodging resistance.
- Intervention effect Late sowing maintained grain yield, kernel weight, and kernels per square meter versus earlier sowing.
- Intervention effect Late sowing reduced nitrogen uptake efficiency by 11.0% versus early sowing.
- Intervention effect Late sowing reduced nitrogen uptake efficiency by 9.9% versus normal sowing.
- Mechanism Reduced root length density and pre-anthesis dry matter explained lower UPE.
- Intervention effect Late sowing raised UTE by 12.9% versus early sowing.
- Intervention effect Late sowing raised UTE by 11.2% versus normal sowing.
- Mechanism Reduced grain nitrogen concentration explained increased UTE.
- Mechanism Opposing UTE and UPE responses yielded equal NUE across sowing dates.