Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Irrigation with nitrogen at 7-day intervals gave the highest seed yield (265.38 g/m 2 /sq m)

A claim from The Effect of Irrigation Intervals Scheduling and Nitrogen and Zinc Content on Wheat Yield and Yield Components in Drought Stress · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation with nitrogen at 7-day intervals gave the highest seed yield (265.38 g/m 2 /sq m)

Treatment
irrigation with of nitrogene2
Outcome
seed yielde2
Direction
higheste2
Value
265.38 g/m 2 /sq me2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Yield and Yield Components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–111
e2

“Seven days irrigation with of nitrogen allocated for highest seed yield (265.38 g/m 2 /sq m)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1315–1407

Title

The Effect of Irrigation Intervals Scheduling and Nitrogen and Zinc Content on Wheat Yield and Yield Components in Drought Stress

N. Parsai; F. Vazin; M. Hassanzadeh Cercetari Agronomice in Moldova 2016. doi:10.1515/cerce-2016-0032

Other claims from this paper (17)

Record rev-ceac252181c5383345f88fb02d384e25d0c7f650435554c5f2b0611a2f6d21c6 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 12 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this claim · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

2,052 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.