Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Co-inoculation enhanced nodule fresh weight and nitrogen content at 100 or 300 mg/kg Cu2+.

A claim from A nodule endophytic plant growth-promoting Pseudomonas and its effects on growth, nodulation and metal uptake in Medicago lupulina under copper stress · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculation enhanced nodule fresh weight and nitrogen content at 100 or 300 mg/kg Cu2+.

Taxon
Medicago lupulinaMedicago lupulinat0
Treatment
Co-inoculation of S. meliloti with Zy-2-1e2
Interactor
S. melilotiSinorhizobium melilotie2symbiont
Second interactor
Zy-2-1e2symbiont
Outcome
nodule fresh weight and nitrogen contente2
Direction
enhancede2
Qualifier
in the presence of 100 or 300 mg/kg Cu2+e2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago lupulina
Medicago lupulina · TaxonAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sinorhizobium meliloti
Sinorhizobium meliloti · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Medicago lupulina under copper stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–150
e2

“Co-inoculation of S. meliloti with Zy-2-1 enhanced M. lupulina root fresh weight, total plant dry weight, number of nodules, nodule fresh weight and nitrogen content in the presence of 100 or 300 mg/kg Cu2+”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 404–610

Title

A nodule endophytic plant growth-promoting Pseudomonas and its effects on growth, nodulation and metal uptake in Medicago lupulina under copper stress

Zhaoyu Kong; Zhenshan Deng; Bernard R. Glick; et al. Annals of Microbiology 2016. doi:10.1007/s13213-016-1235-1

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-cec3ffb94f2c0ec5a6194ee808e8834f41bf5d43ac9204acf8bd551db808cfa1 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

Sinorhizobium meliloti · symbiosis · Medicago lupulinaResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · symbiosis · Medicago lupulinaPositive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.