Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Omitting K reduced wheat grain yield by 2% in 2010-2011.

A claim from Productivity and profitability of Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system as affected by nutrient omissions · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: Ke3
Outcome: grain yield of wheate3
Direction: reductione3
Value: 2%e3
Qualifier: year 2010-2011e3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

*Triticum aestivum* · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0
“Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)wheat (Triticum aestivum)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–89

e3
“The reduction in the grain yield of wheat due to N, P and K omission was 35%, 9.5% and 2%, respectively during the year 2010-2011 and the corresponding figures for the year 2011- 12 were 48.5%, 11.1% and 7.7%, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1385–1607

Title

Productivity and profitability of Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system as affected by nutrient omissions

ASHAQ HUSSAIN; DINESH KUMAR; D.S. RANA; et al. Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v58i2.4190

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Omitting N reduced seed cotton yield by 28% in 2010.
Intervention effect Omitting P reduced seed cotton yield by 6.5% in 2010.
Intervention effect Omitting K reduced seed cotton yield by 14.5% in 2010.
Intervention effect Omitting N reduced seed cotton yield by 26.5 % in 2011.
Intervention effect Omitting P reduced seed cotton yield by 15.5% in 2011.
Intervention effect Omitting K reduced seed cotton yield by 12.4 % in 2011.
Intervention effect Omitting N reduced wheat grain yield by 35% in 2010-2011.
Intervention effect Omitting P reduced wheat grain yield by 9.5% in 2010-2011.
Intervention effect Omitting N reduced wheat grain yield by 48.5% in 2011- 12.
Intervention effect Omitting P reduced wheat grain yield by 11.1% in 2011- 12.
Intervention effect Omitting K reduced wheat grain yield by 7.7% in 2011- 12.
Intervention effect Sulfur omission reduced cotton yield by 2.0-5.0%, statistically at par with optimum nutrition.
Intervention effect Zinc omission reduced cotton yield by 2.0-5.0%, statistically at par with optimum nutrition.
Intervention effect Sulfur omission caused a marginal 2.0-2.5% wheat grain yield reduction in both years.
Intervention effect Zinc omission caused a marginal 2.0-2.5% wheat grain yield reduction in both years.
Observation Optimum nutrition plots had the highest cotton-wheat net profit, 1,33,340 in 2010-11.
Observation Optimum nutrition plots had the highest cotton-wheat net profit, 1,58,340 in 2011-12.

Record rev-cefe73743dfaf1a0b0b1ad61b4c8f345d04e1d059b42e90fdf91b54dfa3bbb48 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

potassium · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

257 papers: 227 positive, 30 negative or no effect

226 papers in the same direction as this claim · 29 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

This claim is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

negative
NK reduced yield to near the unfertilized control level.
Effects of Long-Term Fertilization on Leaf Photosynthetic Characteristics and Grain Yield in Winter Wheat · 2004 · compared with no fertilizer
Opposite direction
no effect
Nano-N with 75% conventional N gave wheat and maize grain yield at par with full conventional fertilizer.
Changes in microbial community structure and yield responses with the use of nano-fertilizers of nitrogen and zinc in wheat–maize system · 2024 · compared with N 100 PK
Opposite direction
no effect
Incorporating P and K into the subsoil did not further change wheat yield.
The effects of subsoiling and deep incorporation of P and K fertilizers on the yield and nutrient uptake of barley, potatoes, wheat and sugar beet grown in rotation · 1979
Opposite direction
no effect
Applications of multiple nutrients did not significantly increase wheat yield.
Evidence for the involvement of the root lesion nematode Pratylenchus thornei in wheat yield decline in northern New South Wales · 1987
Opposite direction
negative
Enterobacter cloacae Rhizo_33 without potassium increased grain yield by 19·16%.
Impact of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on different forms of soil potassium under wheat cultivation · 2019
Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round
no effect
Wheat biomass did not increase with potassium addition.
Differential response of weed and crop species to potassium and sulphur fertilizers · 2007
Opposite direction
no effect
Potassium rates did not significantly affect harvest index.
Potassium Fertilization and its Level on Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Yield in Shallow Depth Soils of Northern Ethiopia · 2017
Opposite direction
no effect
K had no significant effect on grain yield or total dry matter.
Effect of Potassium and Nitrogen Fertilization on Lysine, Methionine, and Total Protein Contents of Wheat Grain, Triticum aestivum L. em. Thell.1 · 1972
Opposite direction

248 papers more in this group

See all 257 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.

Other papers on the same question

potassium · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results