Claim · model-written summary
All irrigated plots yielded significantly more than nonirrigated plots.
- Taxon
- strawberry
_single2.jpg?width=60)
Fragaria ×ananassae1 - Material
- ‘Bounty’e1
- Treatment
- irrigated plotse0
- Outcome
- yieldse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- P < 0.05e0
- Comparator
- nonirrigated plotse0
Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_single2.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“All irrigated plots had significantly higher yields than nonirrigated plots ( P < 0.05).”
e1“strawberry ( Fragaria × ananassa Duch. ‘Bounty’) plants”
Title
Response of Strawberries to Irrigation Scheduling
L. M. Dwyer; D. W. Stewart; L. Houwing; et al. HortScience 1987. doi:10.21273/hortsci.22.1.42
Other claims from this paper (4)
- Intervention effect Mean fruit weight was higher with irrigation, without a significant difference.
- Intervention effect Irrigation did not affect harvest period length.
- Intervention effect Watering on days with rainfall at most 1 mm increased crown development compared with other irrigated and nonirrigated plots.
- Method / resource Predawn leaf water potential was the most conservative irrigation scheduling criterion.