Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Nitrogenous fertilizer showed no evidence of changing white clover yield.

A claim from THE EFFECT OF NITROGENOUS FERTILIZER ON AN ESTABLISHED WHITE CLOVER SWARD · 1961

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogenous fertilizer showed no evidence of changing white clover yield.

Taxon
WHITE CLOVERTrifolium repenst0
Treatment
NITROGENOUS FERTILIZERt0
Outcome
yield responsee0
Direction
no evidencee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no evidence of a yield response.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 154–196
t0

“NITROGENOUS FERTILIZER ON AN ESTABLISHED WHITE CLOVER SWARD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–73

Title

THE EFFECT OF NITROGENOUS FERTILIZER ON AN ESTABLISHED WHITE CLOVER SWARD

D. W. Cowling Grass and Forage Science 1961. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2494.1961.tb00213.x

Other claims from this paper (2)

Record rev-d1e62de5cb822d41b57acfdce163b232838b7f349464f90b91ba63ccedc79ef5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

fertilization · yield · Trifolium repens (white clover)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 20 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.