Paper · 1995 · New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research

Productivity of white clover cultivars under intensive grazing, as affected by high nitrogen fertiliser application

S. F. Ledgard; M. S. Sprosen; K.W. Steele; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract Nine cultivars of white clover (Trifolium repens L.) were grown with perennial ryegrass ( Lolium perenne L.) and their productivity was determined over 3 years under nitrogen (N) fertiliser regimes of 0 or 390 kg N/ha per year. The site was grazed by sheep at 3‐ or 6‐week intervals and after each grazing N fertiliser was applied at 0 or 30 kg N/ha. Fertiliser N application increased total annual pasture production by 25–31%, with the largest proportional responses occurring in autumn and winter. White clover production decreased as a result of N application by 8, 17, and 30% in Years 1, 2, and 3 respectively. During the first 2 years this reduction in clover growth occurred only in spring, and in Year 3 it was also most marked in spring. There was no significant cultivar × N interaction for clover or total pasture production on an annual or seasonal basis. Thus, differences between cultivars in relative clover production were similar in the absence or presence of N fertiliser application. Clover cultivars varied greatly in productivity, and in the nil N treatment there was a positive correlation between clover production and total pasture production in Years 1 and 2, when clover content of pastures averaged 45 and 28% respectively. In all years, Aran and Kopu were higher yielding than all other cultivars. During winter, Kopu was 2–5 fold more productive than other cultivars. In all other seasons, Aran and Kopu were the most productive. There was a highly significant negative correlation between clover production and grass production in both N treatments and in all years. Thus, the more competitive erect‐growing, large‐leaved cultivars of Aran and Kopu maintained a lower associated grass component in their swards.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertiliser N application increased total annual pasture production by 25–31%.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repenst0
Treatment
Fertiliser N applicatione1
Outcome
total annual pasture productione1
Direction
increasede1
Value
25–31%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Productivity of white clover cultivars under intensive grazing, as affected by high nitrogen fertiliser application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–115 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fertiliser N application increased total annual pasture production by 25–31%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–436 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N application reduced white clover production by 8, 17, and 30% in Years 1, 2, and 3 respectively.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repenst0
Treatment
N applicatione2
Outcome
White clover productione2
Direction
decreasede2
Value
8, 17, and 30%e2
Qualifier
in Years 1, 2, and 3 respectivelye2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Productivity of white clover cultivars under intensive grazing, as affected by high nitrogen fertiliser application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–115 · show in text ↑
e2

“White clover production decreased as a result of N application by 8, 17, and 30% in Years 1, 2, and 3 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–624 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the nil N treatment, clover production and total pasture production were positively correlated in Years 1 and 2.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repenst0
Treatment
nil N treatmente3
Outcome
clover production and total pasture productione3
Direction
positive correlatione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Productivity of white clover cultivars under intensive grazing, as affected by high nitrogen fertiliser application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–115 · show in text ↑
e3

“in the nil N treatment there was a positive correlation between clover production and total pasture production in Years 1 and 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1193 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aran and Kopu were higher yielding than all other white clover cultivars.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repenst0
Material
Aran and Kopue4
Outcome
higher yieldinge4
Direction
highere4
Comparator
all other cultivarse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Productivity of white clover cultivars under intensive grazing, as affected by high nitrogen fertiliser application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–115 · show in text ↑
e4

“In all years, Aran and Kopu were higher yielding than all other cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1261–1335 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

During winter, Kopu was 2–5 fold more productive than other white clover cultivars.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repenst0
Material
Kopue7
Outcome
more productivee7
Value
2–5 folde7
Comparator
other cultivarse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Productivity of white clover cultivars under intensive grazing, as affected by high nitrogen fertiliser application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–115 · show in text ↑
e7

“During winter, Kopu was 2–5 fold more productive than other cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1336–1405 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In all other seasons, Aran and Kopu were the most productive white clover cultivars.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repenst0
Material
Aran and Kopue1
Outcome
the most productivee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Productivity of white clover cultivars under intensive grazing, as affected by high nitrogen fertiliser application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–115 · show in text ↑
e1

“In all other seasons, Aran and Kopu were the most productive.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1407–1468 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Clover production and grass production were negatively correlated in both N treatments and in all years.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repenst0
Treatment
both N treatmentse5
Outcome
clover production and grass productione5
Direction
negativee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Productivity of white clover cultivars under intensive grazing, as affected by high nitrogen fertiliser application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–115 · show in text ↑
e5

“a highly significant negative correlation between clover production and grass production in both N treatments and in all years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1479–1605 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aran and Kopu maintained a lower associated grass component in their swards.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repenst0
Material
Aran and Kopue6
Outcome
lower associated grass componente6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Productivity of white clover cultivars under intensive grazing, as affected by high nitrogen fertiliser application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–115 · show in text ↑
e6

“Aran and Kopu maintained a lower associated grass component”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1675–1734 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Trifolium repens (white clover)Results differ

24 papers: 11 positive, 13 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

fertilization · yield · Trifolium repens (white clover)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 20 positive, 7 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.