Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Light absorption and utilization efficiency improved under low light intensity.

A claim from Photosynthetic Responses of four Oak Species to Changes in Light Environment · 2008

Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light absorption and utilization efficiency improved under low light intensity.

Taxon
Q. variabilis and Q. acutissimaQuercus acutissimaQuercus variabilise0
Treatment
low light intensitye1
Outcome
light absorption and light utilization efficiencye1
Direction
improvede1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus acutissima
Quercus acutissima · TaxonBruce Kirchoff · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Quercus variabilis
Quercus variabilis · TaxonVelela · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Q. variabilis and Q. acutissima showed increased leaf growth, chlorophyll content and net apparent quantum yield but reduced chlorophyll a/b and carboxylation efficiency under the low light intensity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–979
e1

“Therefore, light absorption and light utilization efficiency were improved under the low light intensity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1085

Title

Photosynthetic Responses of four Oak Species to Changes in Light Environment

Sun-Hee Kim; Ju-Han Saung; Young-Kul Kim; et al. Korean Journal of Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 2008. doi:10.5532/kjafm.2008.10.4.141

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-d209ec59463da9fe2b41edcb7034de90df99c37e675909d46134dc52fd119a80 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

light · nutrient: content · Quercus variabilisResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.