Claim · model-written summary
Spikelet removal did not change starch content.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativat0 - Treatment
- spikelet removale0
- Outcome
- starch contente0
- Direction
- affectede0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Neither CO2 enrichment nor spikelet removal affected the starch content”
t0“rice”
Title
Effects of CO2 enrichment and spikelet removal on rice quality under open-air field conditions
Li-quan JING; Yan-zhen WU; Shi-teng ZHUANG; et al. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 2016. doi:10.1016/s2095-3119(15)61245-x
Other claims from this paper (13)
- Intervention effect CO2 enrichment decreased head rice percentage and protein concentration.
- Intervention effect CO2 enrichment increased grain chalkiness.
- Intervention effect Spikelet removal increased head rice percentage and protein concentration.
- Intervention effect Spikelet removal reduced grain chalkiness.
- Intervention effect CO2 enrichment did not change starch content.
- Intervention effect Spikelet removal decreased starch granules over 10 µm by 23.6%.
- Intervention effect Spikelet removal decreased 5–10 µm starch granules by 5.6%.
- Intervention effect Spikelet removal increased 2–5 µm starch granules by 4.6%.
- Intervention effect Spikelet removal increased starch granules under 2 µm by 3.3%.
- Intervention effect CO2 elevation increased the proportion of starch granules over 5 µm.
- Intervention effect CO2 elevation decreased the proportion of starch granules under 5 µm.
- Intervention effect Spikelet removal changed starch pasting properties more than CO2 elevation.
- Mechanism Protein concentration and starch granule size were implicated in chalkiness formation.