Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Inoculation did not notably alter overall rhizosphere bacterial and fungal community architecture.

A claim from Distinct responses of wheat microbial communities in phyllosphere and rhizosphere to Puccinia striiformis infection · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation did not notably alter overall rhizosphere bacterial and fungal community architecture.

Organ / stage
rhizospheree0
Treatment
the inoculatione0
Interactor
Puccinia striiformisPuccinia striiformist0pathogen
Outcome
overall architecture of the bacterial and fungal communitiese0
Direction
did not cause a notable alteratione0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Puccinia striiformis
Puccinia striiformis · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the rhizosphere, although the inoculation did not cause a notable alteration to the overall architecture of the bacterial and fungal communities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–883
t0

“wheat microbial communities in phyllosphere and rhizosphere to Puccinia striiformis infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–115
t1

“wheat microbial communities in phyllosphere and rhizosphere to Puccinia striiformis infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–115

Title

Distinct responses of wheat microbial communities in phyllosphere and rhizosphere to Puccinia striiformis infection

Feng Gao; Liya Ma; Xiao Chen; et al. Frontiers in Microbiology 2025. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2025.1639152

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-d24bdf6fa34b2a8daca4f7469f5c67ac64fa0a98cefe854ece5eaec09ac0edc5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

inoculation · Puccinia striiformis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. negative
See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.