Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Reducing tillage did not significantly affect grain protein, fat, starch, energy, or mineral concentrations.

A claim from Reducing Tillage Affects Long-Term Yields but Not Grain Quality of Maize, Soybeans, Oats, and Wheat Produced in Three Contrasting Farming Systems · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing tillage did not significantly affect grain protein, fat, starch, energy, or mineral concentrations.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
reducing tillagee0
Outcome
grain quality metrics including protein, fat, starch, energy, and mineral concentrationse0
Direction
not significantly affectede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain quality metrics including protein, fat, starch, energy, and mineral concentrations were not significantly affected by reducing tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1258
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72

Title

Reducing Tillage Affects Long-Term Yields but Not Grain Quality of Maize, Soybeans, Oats, and Wheat Produced in Three Contrasting Farming Systems

Kirsten Ann Pearsons; Emmanuel Chiwo Omondi; Brad J. Heins; et al. Sustainability 2022. doi:10.3390/su14020631

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-d2bed22cf3aefa310c7ac412c1abcf8730dcf85aeee6232da34daab045d6e4b3 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

tillage · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 22 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.