Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Rice puddling level and irrigation schedule had no residual effect on wheat yield.

A claim from Effect of integrated sources of nutrient, puddling and irrigation schedule on pro- ductivity of rice (Oryza sativa)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice puddling level and irrigation schedule had no residual effect on wheat yield.

Treatment
Level of puddling and irrigation shedulee0
Outcome
wheat yielde0
Direction
no residual effecte0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–141
e0

“Level of puddling and irrigation shedule followed during the rainy-season rice had no residual effect on wheat yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1125

Title

Effect of integrated sources of nutrient, puddling and irrigation schedule on pro- ductivity of rice (Oryza sativa)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system

S.S. PARIHAR Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v49i2.5162

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-d2cb92bb2bab701a48b7c125d5dd23c620ba884114dc574656004705044c69c1 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

190 papers in the same direction as this claim · 798 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

297 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1,116 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

1,405 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.