Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Grain was significantly affected by drainage depth, nitrogen source, timing and depth-by-source interaction.

A claim from Effect of Drain Depth of Vertisols, Nitrogen Source and Time of Application on Yield and Yield Components of Maize (Zea Mays L.) in Ambo, Western Ethiopia · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain was significantly affected by drainage depth, nitrogen source, timing and depth-by-source interaction.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
drain depths, nitrogen sources and time of application, and the interaction effect of drain depths and N sourcee0
Outcome
Graine0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain and stover yields, 1000 grain weight and harvest index (HI) were highly significantly (P 0.05) affected by drain depths, nitrogen sources and time of application, and the interaction effect of drain depths and N source.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1179
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–114

Title

Effect of Drain Depth of Vertisols, Nitrogen Source and Time of Application on Yield and Yield Components of Maize (Zea Mays L.) in Ambo, Western Ethiopia

Tadesse Debele; Bobe Bedadi; H Akbar; et al. International Journal of Research Studies in Agricultural Sciences 2016. doi:10.20431/2454-6224.0206001

Other claims from this paper (17)

Record rev-d34bfa03c81a2042de8c98a45c96c6ee7ed74f3be26bd38f9422834a10788aef · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2,185 papers: 1,906 positive, 279 negative or no effect

1,905 papers in the same direction as this claim · 234 in the opposite direction · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

2,176 papers more in this group

See all 2,185 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.