Intervention effectmodel-written summary

AMF + DSE co-inoculation decreased specific root length and area.

A claim from Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and dark septate endophytes on maize performance and root traits under a high cadmium stress · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF + DSE co-inoculation decreased specific root length and area.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
AMF + DSE co-inoculatione0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Second interactor
DSEe0symbiont
Outcome
specific root length (SRL), specific root area (SRA)e0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both AMF inoculation and AMF + DSE co-inoculation, but not DSE inoculation, significantly increased the chlorophyll contents in maize leaves, resulting in stronger photosynthetic physiology, higher biomass, and increased length, surface area, volume, branches, tips number, and mass density (RTD) of maize roots, but decreased specific root length (SRL), specific root area (SRA), specific root branches (SRB), and specific root tips (SRT).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–1131

Title

Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and dark septate endophytes on maize performance and root traits under a high cadmium stress

Y.M. He; X.M. Fan; G.Q. Zhang; et al. South African Journal of Botany 2019. doi:10.1016/j.sajb.2019.09.018

Other claims from this paper (17)

Record rev-d5a4088bf57b60b3d52d13876ee49315face59ce2d35978cb2844fb5c6e605b0 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

light · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

57 papers: 29 positive, 28 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this claim · 27 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

48 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

188 papers: 169 positive, 19 negative or no effect

168 papers in the same direction as this claim · 17 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

179 papers more in this group

See all 188 papers →

inoculation · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

699 papers: 635 positive, 64 negative or no effect

634 papers in the same direction as this claim · 61 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

690 papers more in this group

See all 699 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.