Intervention effectmodel-written summary

AMF + DSE co-inoculation increased maize leaf chlorophyll content.

A claim from Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and dark septate endophytes on maize performance and root traits under a high cadmium stress · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF + DSE co-inoculation increased maize leaf chlorophyll content.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
AMF + DSE co-inoculatione0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Second interactor
DSEe0symbiont
Outcome
chlorophyll contents in maize leavese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both AMF inoculation and AMF + DSE co-inoculation, but not DSE inoculation, significantly increased the chlorophyll contents in maize leaves, resulting in stronger photosynthetic physiology, higher biomass, and increased length, surface area, volume, branches, tips number, and mass density (RTD) of maize roots, but decreased specific root length (SRL), specific root area (SRA), specific root branches (SRB), and specific root tips (SRT).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–1131

Title

Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and dark septate endophytes on maize performance and root traits under a high cadmium stress

Y.M. He; X.M. Fan; G.Q. Zhang; et al. South African Journal of Botany 2019. doi:10.1016/j.sajb.2019.09.018

Other claims from this paper (17)

Record rev-9eaebccd8f3feb7a4a5ccb2ef325a1ed00638cbdc51bce019f638d75ad0e3e7a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

mycorrhiza · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

25 papers: 23 positive, 2 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

inoculation · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

95 papers: 85 positive, 10 negative or no effect

84 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

86 papers more in this group

See all 95 papers →

light · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 12 positive, 9 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.