Paper · 2015 · African Journal of Agricultural Research

Corn agronomic evaluation under different doses of nitrogen and seed inoculation in savanna

Luiz Rodrigues Torres Jose; Vieira de Faria Marcos; Maria Quintao Lana Regina; et al.

5
claims
5
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The agronomic potential of corn is below the genetic potential of high technology hybrid available in Brazil due to the inadequate management of soil fertility, especially of nitrogen fertilizer, essential photosynthetic activity and determining the crop yield. This study evaluated the agronomic performance and yield of maize culture grown with increasing doses of nitrogen (N), in the absence and presence of Azospirillum brasilense in brazilian Savanna. The design used was the one of randomized blocks in factorial scheme, with five doses of N in corn (0, 50, 100, 150 and 200 kg ha-1), with and without inoculation of the bacterium, with six replications. It analyzed the N content and leaf chlorophyll was measured plant height, stem diameter, insertion spike length and diameter thousand grain weight, grain rot and productivity. The addition of N fertilizers promotes better agronomic performance of maize plants, being this effect greater in the presence of Azospirillum. The productivity of corn respond the dose of 200 kg ha-1 N in the presence of Azospirillum. In 2012/13 crop corn inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense did not cause differences in productivity, plant height, diameter stem, weight of one thousand grains, number of ears and content of chlorophyll A, B and total. Key words: Fertility, nitrogen fertilization, inoculation, productivity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer improved maize agronomic performance, more in the presence of Azospirillum.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
addition of N fertilizerse0
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
Outcome
agronomic performancee0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The addition of N fertilizers promotes better agronomic performance of maize plants, being this effect greater in the presence of Azospirillum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–980 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn productivity responded to 200 kg ha-1 N with Azospirillum.

Treatment
dose of 200 kg ha-1 Ne0
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
Outcome
productivitye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The productivity of corn respond the dose of 200 kg ha-1 N in the presence of Azospirillum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1072 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azospirillum inoculation did not cause differences in corn productivity, plant height, and stem diameter in 2012/13.

Treatment
inoculation with Azospirillum brasilensee0
Interactor
Azospirillum brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee0symbiont
Outcome
productivity, plant height, diameter steme0
Direction
did not cause differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · InteractorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2012/13 crop corn inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense did not cause differences in productivity, plant height, diameter stem, weight of one thousand grains, number of ears and content of chlorophyll A, B and total”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1295 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azospirillum inoculation did not cause differences in thousand grain weight or number of ears in 2012/13.

Treatment
inoculation with Azospirillum brasilensee0
Interactor
Azospirillum brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee0symbiont
Outcome
weight of one thousand grains, number of earse0
Direction
did not cause differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · InteractorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2012/13 crop corn inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense did not cause differences in productivity, plant height, diameter stem, weight of one thousand grains, number of ears and content of chlorophyll A, B and total”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1295 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azospirillum inoculation did not cause differences in chlorophyll A, B, or total content in 2012/13.

Treatment
inoculation with Azospirillum brasilensee0
Interactor
Azospirillum brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee0symbiont
Outcome
content of chlorophyll A, B and totale0
Direction
did not cause differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · InteractorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2012/13 crop corn inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense did not cause differences in productivity, plant height, diameter stem, weight of one thousand grains, number of ears and content of chlorophyll A, B and total”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1295 · show in text ↑

Azospirillum brasilense · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Azospirillum brasilense · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

53 papers: 42 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

inoculation · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

95 papers: 85 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 85 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

91 papers more in this group

See all 95 papers →

fertilization · Azospirillum · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

538 papers: 479 positive, 59 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 479 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

534 papers more in this group

See all 538 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.