Paper · 2014

Inoculation Effects of Nitrogen and Phosphate Biofertilizers on Corn in Presence of Indigenous Microflore of Soil

Saeedeh Ansari; Mohammad Reza Sarikhani; Nosratollah Najafi

7
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In recent years, the production and application of biofertilizer s have been increased. So the main goal of this experiment was the comparison of the common biofertilizers in Iran. Accordingly, in order to investigate the effects of four biofertilizers including Nitroxin, Super nitro plus, Biosuper phosphate and Barvar2 on shoot fresh and dry weight, fresh and dry weight of root, total fresh and dry weight, and other parameters such as concentration s of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and iron in corn (variety Single Cross 704), a pot experiment in greenhouse condition was conducted in completely randomized design with four replications. Treatments included control (non- inoculation), Nitroxin, Super nitro plus, Biosuper phosphate and Barvar2. Seed inoculation with the biofertilizer was done according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Pots were irrigated with distilled water at 0.8 FC. Results showed that inoculation of corn with biofertilizers had significant effect on chlorophyll index, nitrogen and potassium concentration of shoot, shoot uptake of nitrogen and potassium, and moreover iron concentrations of root, and Biosuper phosphate and Barvar2 caused an increase in shoot nitrogen concentration and content while Super nitro plus and Biosuper phosphate had highest increase in potassium concentration and content of shoot. No one of biofertilizers could significantly increase chlorophyll index and Fe concentration of root in comparison with non-inoculated.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer inoculation significantly affected chlorophyll index, shoot nitrogen and potassium measures, and root iron concentration.

Treatment
biofertilizerse0
Outcome
chlorophyll indexe0
Comparator
control (non- inoculation)e1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation of corn with biofertilizers had significant effect on chlorophyll index, nitrogen and potassium concentration of shoot, shoot uptake of nitrogen and potassium, and moreover iron concentrations of root”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–1137 · show in text ↑
e1

“Treatments included control (non- inoculation), Nitroxin, Super nitro plus, Biosuper phosphate and Barvar2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–753 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biosuper phosphate increased shoot nitrogen concentration and content.

Treatment
Biosuper phosphatee0
Outcome
shoot nitrogen concentration and contente0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
control (non- inoculation)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biosuper phosphate and Barvar2 caused an increase in shoot nitrogen concentration and content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1236 · show in text ↑
e1

“control (non- inoculation)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–693 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barvar2 increased shoot nitrogen concentration and content.

Treatment
Barvar2e0
Outcome
shoot nitrogen concentration and contente0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
control (non- inoculation)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biosuper phosphate and Barvar2 caused an increase in shoot nitrogen concentration and content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1236 · show in text ↑
e1

“control (non- inoculation)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–693 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Super nitro plus produced among the highest increases in shoot potassium concentration and content.

Treatment
Super nitro pluse0
Outcome
potassium concentration and content of shoote0
Direction
highest increasee0
Comparator
control (non- inoculation)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Super nitro plus and Biosuper phosphate had highest increase in potassium concentration and content of shoot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1351 · show in text ↑
e1

“control (non- inoculation)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–693 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biosuper phosphate produced among the highest increases in shoot potassium concentration and content.

Treatment
Biosuper phosphatee0
Outcome
potassium concentration and content of shoote0
Direction
highest increasee0
Comparator
control (non- inoculation)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Super nitro plus and Biosuper phosphate had highest increase in potassium concentration and content of shoot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1351 · show in text ↑
e1

“control (non- inoculation)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–693 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No biofertilizer significantly increased chlorophyll index over non-inoculated corn.

Treatment
biofertilizerse0
Outcome
chlorophyll indexe0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
non-inoculatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No one of biofertilizers could significantly increase chlorophyll index and Fe concentration of root in comparison with non-inoculated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1353–1487 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No biofertilizer significantly increased root iron concentration over non-inoculated corn.

Treatment
biofertilizerse0
Outcome
Fe concentration of roote0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
non-inoculatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No one of biofertilizers could significantly increase chlorophyll index and Fe concentration of root in comparison with non-inoculated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1353–1487 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑

inoculation · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

95 papers: 85 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 85 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

91 papers more in this group

See all 95 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

244 papers: 190 positive, 54 negative or no effect

189 papers in the same direction as this paper · 50 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

240 papers more in this group

See all 244 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

306 papers: 288 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 288 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

302 papers more in this group

See all 306 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.