Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Phosphorus application did not increase silicon and phosphorus contents in maize shoots and roots.

A claim from Effect of Silicon on Low pH Soil Phosphorus Sorption and on Uptake and Growth of Maize · 2004

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus application did not increase silicon and phosphorus contents in maize shoots and roots.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
P applicatione0
Outcome
Silicon and P contents in the shoot and the roote0
Direction
note0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Growth of Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–86
e0

“Silicon and P contents in the shoot and the root were increased by Si, but not by P application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–929

Title

Effect of Silicon on Low pH Soil Phosphorus Sorption and on Uptake and Growth of Maize

C. Owino-Gerroh; G. J. Gascho Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 2004. doi:10.1081/lcss-200030686

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-9a1eada97ea6e1716689e289fcc553b239c61681819d911eb1753045ab6aaf42 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

244 papers: 190 positive, 54 negative or no effect

53 papers in the same direction as this claim · 190 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

235 papers more in this group

See all 244 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.