Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Mechanical weed management gave less corn net return under moldboard plow.

A claim from Agronomics and Economics of Different Weed Management Systems in Corn and Soybean · 1999

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mechanical weed management gave less corn net return under moldboard plow.

Treatment
Mechanical weed managemente3
Outcome
net returnse3
Direction
lesse3
Value
$302 ha −1e3
Setting
moldboard plowe3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Mechanical weed management had less net returns in moldboard plow ($302 ha −1) and chisel tillage ($121 ha −1) because of 15% lesser corn densities and greater weed densities”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 707–883

Title

Agronomics and Economics of Different Weed Management Systems in Corn and Soybean

William J. Cox; J. S. Singer; E. J. Shields; et al. Agronomy Journal 1999. doi:10.2134/agronj1999.914585x

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-d5c4f8cedbb17a60c769ee4688ca3f5373812fc18f0e18175c206b7df8007904 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

herbicide · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

651 papers: 500 positive, 151 negative or no effect

150 papers in the same direction as this claim · 500 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
    Mean net return was moderately higher for herbicides.

    Evaluation of Mechanical Weed Management Programs for Corn (Zea mays) · 1997 · compared with best mechanical treatment

    Opposite directionCited by this paper

  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

642 papers more in this group

See all 651 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.