Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Dormant-stage water deficit had no significant biomass effect.

A claim from Effects of Water Deficit and Supplemental Irrigation on Winter Wheat Growth, Grain Yield and Quality, Nutrient Uptake, and Residual Mineral Nitrogen in Soil · 2005

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dormant-stage water deficit had no significant biomass effect.

Treatment
Water deficit at dormant stagee0
Outcome
biomass productione0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedTaxonMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“Water deficit at dormant stage had no significant effect on biomass production, but it may have hindered the allocation of assimilates to the heads.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1067–1215

Title

Effects of Water Deficit and Supplemental Irrigation on Winter Wheat Growth, Grain Yield and Quality, Nutrient Uptake, and Residual Mineral Nitrogen in Soil

Zhaohui Wang; Shengxiu Li; Cecil L. Vera; et al. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 2005. doi:10.1081/css-200058480

Other claims from this paper (18)

Record rev-d5cdabc443813dc6511829d011bbca9396e0518dfec6f5f9ee27577ed755c147 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

drought · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

632 papers: 95 positive, 537 negative or no effect

537 papers in the same direction as this claim · 94 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

623 papers more in this group

See all 632 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.